Brad Garlinghouse, Bridget van Kralingen, Kathryn Haun on cryptocurrency | Code 2018



Recode’s Peter Kafka interviews Brad Garlinghouse, CEO, Ripple and Bridget van Kralingen, SVP, IBM Global Industries, Platforms and Blockchain and Kathryn …

43 Comments

  1. Hi guys this ripple company is a joke it only opens up a 1000 trunsctions whenever they want but on the regular days it only allow few trunsctions. As I have been following XRP normally we earn no less than 2 to 5% a day. cuz Remmber last year ripple started going up only when bitcoin finished going up and started going down only then ripple started going up which is a weird thing because they say xrp is linked to bitcoin that means when bitcoin goes up ripple goes up very weird fact.
    there is no balance in terms of fact

  2. XRP is a useless shitcoin…! Saying Bitcoin won't scale shows your ignorance about the tech… XRP made this stupid guy rich but he's really poor from heart n mind… See you in the future

  3. the fact that so much of this discussion revolves around Bitcoin says quite a bit. Bitcoin is a dinosaur already and won't be relevant for long beyond a store of value. there are many newer technologies solving many of Bitcoin's problems….funny how you don't hear them mention Stellar, Waves, Cardano, and others… more evidence that this discussion is mostly spin.

  4. Damn, Bridget is the prime example of a sales person within an IT company. I encourage everyone to watch Steve Jobs video on sales vs product people. It seems to me that she is a prime example of the problem. Just throwing around buzz words and sheding away from responsibility by saying that it is still early days and she cant look into the crystal ball. One should bring in more technicalities into the discussion. It is still early days, after all, right?

  5. Any interviewer who questions a so called "blockchain", "crypto", "expert", who doesn't first, deeply familiarize themself in the principals and concepts outlined in "The Bitcoin Standard" by Saifedean Ammous, may find that their lack of understanding, may result in embarrassing backpedaling (or at a minimum apologizing), for not having the ability to ask, and push for answers to, the most important questions that really matter in promoting true understanding for the regulasr folks who are curious and want to know what it is, how it may help them, and why they should care.
    Specifically:

    1. Who enters the data correctly and honestly into the blockchain so that all others can trust it?
    2. Who verifies transactions and what is their incentive to do so honestly?
    3. How many full nodes support the systems?
    4. Who can change the code?
    5. How are new tokens created, who gets them 1st, and who has them now?
    6. How are mistakes entered in the blockchain corrected (if they can be), and if they can be, doesn't that make it non-immutable?
    7. Bitcoin can be sent anywhere in the world in seconds, (and is every day), it can be verified, non-reversable, and immutable within about an hour, and Brad is still trying to convince people that the fastest way to get money to Europe is to fly it there. Why not challenge that?
    8. The only reason for an immutable value transfer system like Bitcoin is to eliminate 3rd party intermediaries and having to trust any one actor using the system. Why do all these other blockchain need this feature and do they really have it?
    9. Why no challenge regarding sound money (Bitcoin), and all other government controlled, inflatable, money (including XRP)?

    I can go on and on. I hope the point is clear. The facts are not being presented fairly, or in many cases accurately, because interviewers don't understand the ecosystem well enough. And this interviewer was one of the better ones I have seen.

    I hope this improves soon. These people who are promoting all the uses for blockchain also (predominantly) don't understand much about the ecosystem and are fasly presenting use cases and applications which are nothing more than hype surrounding "blockchain".

    1 last thing, notice how everyone conveniently uses Bitcoin to either trash it, so it will make their idea seem better, or promote any of the features that make Bitcoin work, in order to justify why what they are doing matters.

    Can someone please tell everyone – IF BITCOIN DIES, EVERYTHING ELSE DIES WITH IT.

  6. as a main XRP holder, I guess its safe to say that "Ripple" isn't accountable for making XRP price go up. I guess this would be a "High Risk" Investment. JUst thought Id put that out there. I will still hold my "XRP" though.

  7. Finally, intelligent people, speaking intelligently about an intelligent technology. No moons or lambos or sleeping giants…no moderator with a specific interest towards Bitcoin or Litecoin or shitcoin this and shitcoin that. So refreshing

Leave a Reply to Javi Gonzalez Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*